UK lawmakers seek a ban on the use of so-called “forever chemicals” in a wide range of everyday products.
UK lawmakers have called for a phased ban on the use of so-called “forever chemicals” in a wide range of everyday products, including school uniforms, non-stick cookware and food packaging, amid rising concerns over their long-term health and environmental impact.
What MPs are proposing
A report by the House of Commons’ Environmental Audit Committee has requested the government to ban the non-essential use of PFAS chemicals — a large group of man-made substances used to make products water, stain and heat resistant.The MPs have recommended that from 2027, PFAS should be phased out wherever safer alternatives exist, with exemptions only where their use is deemed essential or unavoidable.
Why PFAS are under scrutiny
PFAS, often referred to as “forever chemicals”, are used in thousands of consumer and industrial products, from raincoats and school uniforms to firefighting foam and medical equipment.Their durability is also the problem — they do not break down easily in the environment and can accumulate in water, soil and even the human body over time.Some studies have linked certain PFAS to health risks including kidney cancer, immune system effects and increased cholesterol levels, though research is still ongoing for many of the chemicals.
“Nearly all of us have PFAS in our bodies”
Committee chair Toby Perkins said evidence presented during the inquiry suggests widespread exposure is already a reality.He said while the public should not panic, “now is the time to act” before pollution levels worsen further, BBC reported.Experts also warned that PFAS are often added to products for convenience, such as stain resistance in clothing, without consumers being aware.
Calls for stricter regulation and cleanup
The report also recommends:
- A “polluter pays” system where companies fund cleanup costs
- A national remediation fund for affected communities
- Stronger limits on releasing PFAS into the environment
- Investment in technologies to safely destroy the chemicals
Industry and government response
Environmental groups and scientists have largely welcomed the recommendations, calling them a necessary shift toward stronger regulation.However, industry representatives argue that a blanket ban could have unintended consequences, including higher costs and increased waste.The UK government said it is reviewing the proposals and pointed to its existing PFAS action plan, which focuses on monitoring, tighter controls and reducing exposure through safer alternatives.
